From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Martin

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 10, 2018
2018-1085 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 10, 2018)

Opinion

2018-1085

07-10-2018

IN RE: JOHN FRANCIS MARTIN, CHARLES HENRY RODICK, Appellants

J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants. AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/662,793.

JUDGMENT

J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants. AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, O'MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 10, 2018

Date

/s/Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Martin

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 10, 2018
2018-1085 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 10, 2018)
Case details for

In re Martin

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: JOHN FRANCIS MARTIN, CHARLES HENRY RODICK, Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 10, 2018

Citations

2018-1085 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 10, 2018)