From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Marman

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Feb 24, 2016
No. S229881 (Cal. Feb. 24, 2016)

Opinion

S229881

02-24-2016

MARMAN ON DISCIPLINE


Petition for review denied; recommended discipline imposed

The petition for review is denied.

The court orders that JOSEPH HENRY MARMAN, State Bar Number 129517, is suspended from the practice of law in California for two years, execution of that period of suspension is stayed, and he is placed on probation for three years subject to the following conditions:

1. JOSEPH HENRY MARMAN is suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of the first two years of probation, and he will remain suspended until he provides proof to the State Bar Court of his rehabilitation, fitness to practice and learning and ability in the general law. (Rules Proc. of State Bar, tit. IV, Stds. for Atty. Sanctions for Prof. Misconduct, std. 1.2(c)(1).)

2. JOSEPH HENRY MARMAN must also comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Decision filed on August 31, 2015.

3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if JOSEPH HENRY MARMAN has complied with all conditions of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be terminated.

JOSEPH HENRY MARMAN must also take and pass the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination during the period of his suspension and provide satisfactory proof of such passage to the State Bar's Office of Probation in Los Angeles within the same period. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)

JOSEPH HENRY MARMAN must also comply with California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days, respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may result in disbarment or suspension.

Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7 and as a money judgment.


Summaries of

In re Marman

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Feb 24, 2016
No. S229881 (Cal. Feb. 24, 2016)
Case details for

In re Marman

Case Details

Full title:MARMAN ON DISCIPLINE

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Feb 24, 2016

Citations

No. S229881 (Cal. Feb. 24, 2016)