From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Manock

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Feb 1, 2023
No. S277494 (Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)

Opinion

S277494

02-01-2023

MANOCK ON DISCIPLINE


Recommended discipline imposed

The court orders that CHARLES KENDALL MANOCK (Respondent), State Bar Number 161633, is suspended from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that period of suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for two years subject to the following conditions:

1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first 60 days of probation;

2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on October 21, 2022; and

3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be terminated.

Respondent must provide to the State Bar's Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on October 21, 2022. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)

Respondent must pay monetary sanctions to the State Bar of California Client Security Fund in the amount of $2,500 in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6086.13 and rule 5.137 of the Rules of Procedure of the State Bar. Monetary sanctions are enforceable as a money judgment and may be collected by the State Bar through any means permitted by law.

Respondent must also comply with California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days, respectively, after the date this order is filed. (Athearn v. State Bar (1982) 32 Cal.3d 38, 45 [the operative date for identification of clients being represented in pending matters and others to be notified is the filing date of this order].)

Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7 and as a money judgment, and may be collected by the State Bar through any means permitted by law


Summaries of

In re Manock

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Feb 1, 2023
No. S277494 (Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)
Case details for

In re Manock

Case Details

Full title:MANOCK ON DISCIPLINE

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Feb 1, 2023

Citations

No. S277494 (Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)