From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ludwig

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Dec 20, 2006
Nos. 03-04-00464-CV, 03-04-00466-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2006)

Opinion

Nos. 03-04-00464-CV, 03-04-00466-CV

Filed: December 20, 2006.

Appeal from the Original Proceedings from Travis County.

Before Justices KIDD, B. A. SMITH and PURYEAR.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On December 15, 2006, the supreme court held that this Court erred in granting Ruby V. Ludwig's and Joy Higdon's petitions for writ of mandamus because they had an adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Texas Dep't of Family Protective Servs., No. 04-1043, 2006 Tex. LEXIS 1265, at *11-*12 (Tex. December 15, 2006). Consequently, we vacate our original order issued on October 21, 2004, and deny the relators' petitions for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Ludwig

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Dec 20, 2006
Nos. 03-04-00464-CV, 03-04-00466-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2006)
Case details for

In re Ludwig

Case Details

Full title:In re Ruby V. Ludwig., In re Joy Higdon

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Dec 20, 2006

Citations

Nos. 03-04-00464-CV, 03-04-00466-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2006)