From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lucas

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Oct 17, 1989
110 B.R. 335 (M.D. Tenn. 1989)

Opinion

Bankruptcy No. 386-05479. Adv. No. 388-0143. Civ. A. No. 3:89-0575.

October 17, 1989.

David J. Cocke, William C. Denton, Borod and Kramer, Memphis, Tenn., Jane B. Forbes, Franklin, Tenn., for plaintiff, appellee.

James Flexer, Nashville, Tenn., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM


This is an appeal from the memorandum and order entered by the Bankruptcy Judge on June 8, 1989, 100 B.R. 969, determining that Forbes as Trustee was entitled to recover from the Holiday Corporation Savings and Retirement Plan certain sums of money which were contributed by Lucas to Holiday Corporation Savings and Retirement Plan, an ERISA qualified pension trust.

The opinion of the Bankruptcy Judge is incorporated herein as fully as if copied verbatim, is affirmed in its entirety, and is adopted by this court as the court's opinion and memorandum.

Forbes, the Trustee, seeks to assess costs and attorney fees to the defendant because of an alleged frivolous appeal on the question involved. Since there is substantial doubt concerning the principle of law involved in this case, the court determines that the appeal was not frivolous and therefore does not tax costs and attorney fees against the defendant.

An appropriate order will be entered dismissing the appeal in this case.


Summaries of

In re Lucas

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Oct 17, 1989
110 B.R. 335 (M.D. Tenn. 1989)
Case details for

In re Lucas

Case Details

Full title:In re Elizabeth Hayes LUCAS, Debtor. Jane B. FORBES, Trustee, Plaintiff…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Oct 17, 1989

Citations

110 B.R. 335 (M.D. Tenn. 1989)