Opinion
CASE NO. CA2012-02-041
07-23-2012
IN THE MATTER OF: L.R.T.
Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Fl., Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee Amy R. Ashcraft, 240 East State Street, Trenton, Ohio 45067, for appellant, Shannon T. Fran Sweeney, 772 Tylers Place Blvd., West Chester, Ohio 45069, guardian ad litem Andrew Temin, 246 High Street, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for L.R.T.
DECISION
APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
JUVENILE DIVISION
Case No. JN2009-0406
Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Fl., Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee Amy R. Ashcraft, 240 East State Street, Trenton, Ohio 45067, for appellant, Shannon T. Fran Sweeney, 772 Tylers Place Blvd., West Chester, Ohio 45069, guardian ad litem Andrew Temin, 246 High Street, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for L.R.T.
Per Curiam .
{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived.
{¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, Shannon T., has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.