From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lowenstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 21, 2007
190 N.J. 58 (N.J. 2007)

Opinion

March 21, 2007.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-254, concluding that JOSEPH J. LOWENSTEIN of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 4.1(a)(2) (failing to disclose material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a fraudulent act by a client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH J. LOWENSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Over-sight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Lowenstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 21, 2007
190 N.J. 58 (N.J. 2007)
Case details for

In re Lowenstein

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH J. LOWENSTEIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 21, 2007

Citations

190 N.J. 58 (N.J. 2007)
918 A.2d 593

Citing Cases

In re Schultz

See, e.g., In re Kasdan, 115 N.J. 472, 488 (1989) (client); In reLowenstein, 190 N.J. 58 (2007) (third party…

In re Macchi

ird parties generally receive reprimands. See, e.g., In re Walcott, 217 N.J. 367 (2014) (attorney…