From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re L.M.T.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 7, 2013
738 S.E.2d 359 (N.C. 2013)

Opinion

No. 40PA13.

2013-03-7

In the Matter of L.M.T., A.M.T.

J. Thomas Diepenbrock, Asheville, for Dickerson, Kimmie Medena. Christopher Carr, for Cumberland County DSS.


J. Thomas Diepenbrock, Asheville, for Dickerson, Kimmie Medena. Christopher Carr, for Cumberland County DSS.
Beth Hall, GAL Attorney Advocate, for GAL.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioners (Cumberland County DSS & Guardian Ad Litem) on the 22nd of January 2013 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of March 2013.”

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of January 2013 by Petitioners (Cumberland County DSS & Guardian Ad Litem) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of March 2013.”

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).


Summaries of

In re L.M.T.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 7, 2013
738 S.E.2d 359 (N.C. 2013)
Case details for

In re L.M.T.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of L.M.T., A.M.T.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

738 S.E.2d 359 (N.C. 2013)
366 N.C. 563

Citing Cases

In re L.M.T.

We allowed discretionary review to consider the requirement that a trial court make certain findings of fact…