From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lippert

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 9, 2017
2016-2255 (Fed. Cir. May. 9, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2255

05-09-2017

IN RE: RITA LIPPERT, RUDOLF LINDER, Appellants

SCOTT BLACKMAN, Nath, Goldberg and Meyer, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JOSHUA BRIAN GOLDBERG. KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for Appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT MCBRIDE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/273,337.

JUDGMENT

SCOTT BLACKMAN, Nath, Goldberg and Meyer, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JOSHUA BRIAN GOLDBERG. KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for Appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT MCBRIDE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 9, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Lippert

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 9, 2017
2016-2255 (Fed. Cir. May. 9, 2017)
Case details for

In re Lippert

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: RITA LIPPERT, RUDOLF LINDER, Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 9, 2017

Citations

2016-2255 (Fed. Cir. May. 9, 2017)