From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lichtenstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 30, 2005
870 A.2d 623 (N.J. 2005)

Opinion

March 30, 2005


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-432, recommending that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(c), JEFFREY P. LICHTENSTEIN, formerly of EAST BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since March 2, 2004, be disbarred on the basis of his guilty plea to theft by deception ( N.J.S.A. 2C:20-4), and his admission that he knowingly misappropriated client funds, conduct in violation of RPC 8.4(b) and (c) (conduct involving fraud, dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation) and the principles of In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979);

And JEFFREY P. LICHTENSTEIN having failed to appear as ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JEFFREY P. LICHTENSTEIN be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that JEFFREY P. LICHTENSTEIN be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Lichtenstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 30, 2005
870 A.2d 623 (N.J. 2005)
Case details for

In re Lichtenstein

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY P. LICHTENSTEIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 30, 2005

Citations

870 A.2d 623 (N.J. 2005)
870 A.2d 623