From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lee

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 13, 2020
No. 05-20-00168-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2020)

Opinion

No. 05-20-00168-CV

02-13-2020

IN RE PHYLLIS LEE, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-06171

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Pedersen
Opinion by Justice Bridges

Before the Court is relator's petition for writ of mandamus and "motion for TEX. R. CIV. P. 694." Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

We also DENY relator's motion.

/David L. Bridges/

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE 200168F.P05


Summaries of

In re Lee

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 13, 2020
No. 05-20-00168-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2020)
Case details for

In re Lee

Case Details

Full title:IN RE PHYLLIS LEE, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Feb 13, 2020

Citations

No. 05-20-00168-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2020)