From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Larkin

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
May 12, 2015
Cause number: 01-15-00392-CV (Tex. App. May. 12, 2015)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-15-00392-CV

05-12-2015

In re Hugh Larkin, Relator.


ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: Motion to Deliver Privileged Documents for In Camera Review Parties filing motion: Relator Document to be filed: Documents for In Camera Review in Sealed Envelope Is appeal accelerated? Yes (mandamus) If motion to extend time:

Original due date: N/A



Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: N/A



Date Requested: N/A
Ordered that motion is:
[v] Granted



If document is to be filed, document due: 10 days from the date of this order.



[ ] Denied



[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)



[v] Other: __________



Relator's motion to deliver privileged documents for in camera review, for this Court's review of his mandamus petition, is granted. Accordingly, relator is ordered to deliver the same documents that were presented to the trial court for in camera review to the Clerk of this Court in a sealed envelope marked, "Submitted for In Camera Review Only," with the cause number and style, within 10 days of the date of this order. Cf. TEX. R. CIV. P. 193.4(a).
Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court
Date: May 12, 2015 November 7, 2008 Revision


Summaries of

In re Larkin

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
May 12, 2015
Cause number: 01-15-00392-CV (Tex. App. May. 12, 2015)
Case details for

In re Larkin

Case Details

Full title:In re Hugh Larkin, Relator.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: May 12, 2015

Citations

Cause number: 01-15-00392-CV (Tex. App. May. 12, 2015)