From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lapham

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jan 15, 2013
742 S.E.2d 1 (S.C. 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013–000054.

2013-01-15

In the Matter of Steven Robert LAPHAM, Respondent.


ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(c) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). The petition also seeks appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent's clients pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that James D. Jolly, Jr., Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent's client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Jolly shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent's clients. Mr. Jolly may make disbursements from respondent's trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating account(s) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that James D. Jolly, Jr., Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that James D. Jolly, Jr., Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent's mail and the authority to direct that respondent's mail be delivered to Mr. Jolly's office.

Mr. Jolly's appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless an extension of the period of appointment is requested.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

/s/FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

In re Lapham

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jan 15, 2013
742 S.E.2d 1 (S.C. 2013)
Case details for

In re Lapham

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Steven Robert LAPHAM, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

742 S.E.2d 1 (S.C. 2013)
742 S.E.2d 1

Citing Cases

In re Lapham

Respondent was placed on interim suspension on January 15, 2013, and James Jolly, Jr. was appointed as ATP.…

In re Lapham

By order dated January 15, 2013, the Court placed respondent on interim suspensionand appointed James D.…