accepting Board panel's finding that attorney violated Rule 3.3 (candor to tribunal) when he failed to disclose he did not give complete and accurate testimony in previous disciplinary proceeding
Summary of this case from In re The Supreme Court of Del.No. 61, 2017
03-09-2017
In the MATTER OF a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware: S. Harold LANKENAU, Respondent.
ACCEPTED.
accepting Board panel's finding that attorney violated Rule 3.3 (candor to tribunal) when he failed to disclose he did not give complete and accurate testimony in previous disciplinary proceeding
Summary of this case from In re The Supreme Court of Del.accepting Board panel’s finding that attorney violated Rule 3.3 (candor to tribunal) when he failed to disclose he did not give complete and accurate testimony in previous disciplinary proceeding
Summary of this case from In re AbbottFull title:IN THE MATTER OF A MEMBER OF THE BAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF…
Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Date published: Mar 9, 2017
In re Hurley, 183 A.3d 703, 2018 WL 1319010, at *3-5 (Del. Mar. 14, 2018) (TABLE) (accepting Board panel's…
In re AbbottIn re Hurley, 183 A.3d 703, 2018 WL 1319010, at *3–5 (Del. Mar. 14, 2018) (TABLE) (accepting Board panel’s…