In Landesman v. Whitton, 13 Misc.3d 1216(A), 2006 WL 2808070 (Supreme Court, Dutchess County, Dickerson, J., October 2, 2006), aff'd.
Summary of this case from Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of the City of RyeOctober 2, 2006.
Process — Service of Process — Tax Certiorari Proceeding.
In Landesman v. Whitton, 13 Misc.3d 1216(A), 2006 WL 2808070 (Supreme Court, Dutchess County, Dickerson, J., October 2, 2006), aff'd.
Summary of this case from Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of the City of RyeIn Matter of Landesman v Whitton (13 Misc 3d 1216[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51847[U] [Sup Ct, Dutchess County, Oct. 2, 2006, Dickerson, J.], aff'd 46 AD3d 827 [2d Dept 2007]), the petitioner had served the Poughkeepsie School District, but had not directly served the Superintendent of the district.
Summary of this case from In re Michael F.X. RyanIn Matter of Landesman v Whitton (13 Misc 3d 1216[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51847[U] [Sup Ct, Dutchess County, Oct. 2, 2006, Dickerson, J.], affd 46 AD3d 827 [2d Dept 2007]), the petitioner had mailed the petition to the Poughkeepsie School District, but not the superintendent of the district directly.
Summary of this case from Wyeth Holdings v. AssessorFull title:Matter of Landesman v. Whitton
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Dutchess County
Date published: Oct 2, 2006
Notably, RPTL 708 (3) is a notice statute, not a service statute, since by its terms those entities noticed…
Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of the City of RyeHere, the District, through an employee, affirms that in none of the tax years at issue did it receive notice…