Opinion
No. 2003-OB-2792.
November 12, 2003.
IN RE: Lain, Rose M.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Petition for Reinstatement Pending Board Review Office of the Disciplinary Board, No. 03-DB-039;
Motion denied. See Per Curiam.
JPV
PFC
CDK
BJJ
CDT
JTK
JLW
ORDER
Treating respondent's September 22, 2003 correspondence as a motion by respondent seeking to practice law during the pendency of her reinstatement proceeding,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is denied. There is no procedure in Supreme Court Rule XIX permitting a suspended attorney to practice law prior to a determination that the criteria for reinstatement set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24 have been satisfied.
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this ___ day of November, 2003.
FOR THE COURT:
JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA