In re Kuhl

2 Citing cases

  1. Curley v. Henson

    8:21-cv-2433-TPB-SPF (M.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2022)

    Federal maritime law applies to this action. See, e.g., Kuhl, No. 21-cv-60408, 2021 WL 3270084, at *3 (S.D. Fla. July 30, 2021); Matter of Rogers, No. 4:18-cv-10012-JLK, 2018 WL 11229132, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 18, 2018). As such, “the proper standard of care is that of general maritime law, rather than the higher standard of care imposed by Florida Statute § 327.32.”

  2. In re AMI Prof'l Grp.

    8:21-cv-1866-TPB-AAS (M.D. Fla. Dec. 10, 2021)

    Federal maritime law applies to this action. See, e.g., Kuhl, No. 21-cv-60408, 2021 WL 3270084, at *3 (S.D. Fla. July 30, 2021); Matter of Rogers, No. 4:18-cv-10012-JLK, 2018 WL 11229132, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 18, 2018). As such, “the proper standard of care is that of general maritime law, rather than the higher standard of care imposed by Florida Statute § 327.32.”