From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kodiak Prods. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 2, 2012
NO. 02-12-00229-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-12-00229-CV

08-02-2012

IN RE KODIAK PRODUCTS CO., RELATOR INC.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REHEARING

On July 9, 2010, this court issued a memorandum opinion denying relator's petition for writ of mandamus as moot. Relator filed a motion for rehearing. After due consideration, we deny Relator's motion but withdraw our prior memorandum opinion and substitute the following in its place.

The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. The issues presented therein, as they relate to relator's misappropriation of trade secrets, civil theft, and conversion claims, have become moot by virtue of the trial court's July 2, 2012 Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. As to relator's remaining claim for unfair competition, the court is also of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

The stay of the trial court proceedings in cause number 236-252084-11, styled Kodiak Products Co., Inc. v. Charles H. Deegear, Jr. and Deemaxx Components, Inc., pending in the 236th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, is hereby lifted.

PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).


Summaries of

In re Kodiak Prods. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 2, 2012
NO. 02-12-00229-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2012)
Case details for

In re Kodiak Prods. Co.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KODIAK PRODUCTS CO., RELATOR INC.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Aug 2, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-12-00229-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2012)