From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Killorin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 10, 1996
232 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 10, 1996.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 1, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Before: Crew III, J.P., White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ.


Claimant, who was employed as a tractor trailer driver, lost his job when his commercial driver's license was revoked after his second conviction for driving while intoxicated. The Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits upon the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Based upon our review of the record, we find that the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence. Claimant provoked his discharge by engaging in the voluntary act of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, which resulted in his loss of a necessary qualification of his employment, a commercial driver's license ( see, Matter of Moulton [Hudacs], 198 AD2d 595). Although claimant suffers from the disease of alcoholism, we do not find that this absolves him of responsibility for the volitional act of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol ( see, supra). Consequently, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision. We have considered claimant's remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Killorin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 10, 1996
232 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Killorin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of TIMOTHY J. KILLORIN, Appellant. JOHN E…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 10, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 182

Citing Cases

Stanton v. Town of Bethel

We affirm. Claimants who have undertaken voluntary actions that have resulted in the forfeiture of their…

Stanton v. Comm'r Labor

We affirm. Claimants who have undertaken voluntary actions that have resulted in the forfeiture of their…