From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kern v. Excelsior 57th Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 2, 2000
270 A.D.2d 25 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Summary

In Kern v. Excelsior 57th Corp., 270 AD2d 25 (1st Dept 2000), the court held that where a party designated arbitrator died after conclusion of the hearing but prior to rendering of the final award, the arbitration need not be commenced de novo before an entirely new panel.

Summary of this case from Northstar Mech., Inc. v. JCH Delta Contr.

Opinion

March 2, 2000

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered August 31, 1999, which, inter alia, granted petitioners' motion, pursuant to CPLR article 75 to compel respondent to select a substitute arbitrator in tripartite arbitration in place of respondent's previously selected arbitrator, who died before completion of the arbitrators' deliberations and the rendering of a final award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Lauren Reiter Brody, for Petitioners-Respondents.

Daniel J. Brooks, for Respondent-Appellant.

NARDELLI, J.P., TOM, LERNER, RUBIN, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


The lease providing for arbitration of the underlying dispute in accordance with CPLR article 75, does not provide what is to occur in the event of an arbitrator's death where, as here, an arbitration is ongoing. In the absence of a written agreement addressing that situation, we reject respondent's contention that, upon an arbitrator's death, an arbitration in progress must be commenced de novo before an entirely new panel. Rather, where the parties have made no agreement to pursue a course other than that charted by the statute, the statutory provisions should govern, and "when an arbitrator cannot act for reasons of health or unavailability or other circumstance tantamount to the occurrence of a vacancy . . . there is statutory authorization for a court to appoint a replacement (CPLR 7504 )" (Siegel v. Lewis, 40 N.Y.2d 687, 689). The death of an arbitrator after conclusion of a hearing but prior to rendering an award constitutes such inability to act and permits appointment of a successor (see, e.g., Chris O'Connell, Inc. v. Beacon Looms, Inc., 235 A.D.2d 248, 249).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Kern v. Excelsior 57th Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 2, 2000
270 A.D.2d 25 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

In Kern v. Excelsior 57th Corp., 270 AD2d 25 (1st Dept 2000), the court held that where a party designated arbitrator died after conclusion of the hearing but prior to rendering of the final award, the arbitration need not be commenced de novo before an entirely new panel.

Summary of this case from Northstar Mech., Inc. v. JCH Delta Contr.
Case details for

In re Kern v. Excelsior 57th Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In re Arbitration Between RALPH W. KERN, et al., Petitioners-Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 2, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 25 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 41

Citing Cases

Northstar Mech., Inc. v. JCH Delta Contr.

The court rejected as speculative the argument that the arbitration should start anew before a three-person…

Escava v. Escava

. Accordingly, contrary to Seymour's assertion, since the court has already determined that the parties'…