From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re the Claim of Roe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 14, 2009
62 A.D.3d 1105 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 504990.

May 14, 2009.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 31, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Alexander Bursztein, Legal Aid Society of Rockland County, New City, for appellant.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Kane, Malone Jr. and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's finding that claimant, a coordinator for a temporary employment agency for nurses and home health aides, was discharged from her employment due to misconduct. An employee's unauthorized absence from work has been held to constitute misconduct that disqualifies the claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits ( see Matter of Tahat [Commissioner of Labor], 58 AD3d 921; Matter of Britter [Commissioner of Labor], 54 AD3d 461, 461). The record establishes that the employer unequivocally denied claimant's request for two weeks of vacation and, instead, offered an accommodation of five business days of vacation time if she submitted a vacation request form. Claimant does not dispute that she failed to submit the requested form and, in any event, did not report to work for at least eight business days. To the extent that testimony by claimant and the employer differed on whether claimant was granted verbal permission to take two weeks of vacation at the time of her hiring, and whether vacation request forms were available, this presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve ( see Matter of Tahat [Commissioner of Labor], 58 AD3d at 921; Matter of Ramirez [Commissioner of Labor], 49 AD3d 953, 954).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re the Claim of Roe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 14, 2009
62 A.D.3d 1105 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re the Claim of Roe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of KATHERINE M. ROE, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 14, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 1105 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
878 N.Y.S.2d 520

Citing Cases

Kirilytchev v. Cent. Moving & Storage Co.

Claimant appeals. We affirm. “An employee's unauthorized absence from work has been held to constitute…

In re Rivers

Claimant now appeals. An unauthorized absence from work has been held to constitute misconduct which can…