From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kane

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Feb 5, 2016
No. 3 WM 2016 (Pa. Feb. 5, 2016)

Opinion

No. 3 WM 2016

02-05-2016

IN RE KATHLEEN GRANAHAN KANE


ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2016, because Petitioner did not seek recusal at the earliest possible time, her objection is waived as a matter of law and cannot form the basis to invalidate a judicial determination. See Goodheart v. Casey, 565 A.2d 757, 763 (Pa. 1989). Petitioner's claims of bias are untimely and are not properly before this Court for consideration. Petitioner's Application for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED, on the basis of waiver.

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Kane

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Feb 5, 2016
No. 3 WM 2016 (Pa. Feb. 5, 2016)
Case details for

In re Kane

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KATHLEEN GRANAHAN KANE

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 5, 2016

Citations

No. 3 WM 2016 (Pa. Feb. 5, 2016)