From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re J.W

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas
Apr 26, 2000
49 S.W.3d 7 (Tex. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 05-99-0705-CV.

April 26, 2000.

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court. Dallas County, Texas, Don Koons, J.; Trial Court Cause No. 94-2509-U.

Charles W. McGarry, Law Offices of Charles W. McGarry, Dallas, for appellant.

Grier Pat Jones, Dallas, for appellee.

William T. (Bill) Hill Jr., District Attorney, Kenneth Jefferson Bray, Assistant District Attorney, Dallas, for the State.

Before Justice OVARD, MORRIS, and WRIGHT.


OPINION


Appellants Susan Warren Griffin and David Griffin each filed an affidavit of indigence in this appeal, and the trial court sustained the district clerk's contests to their requests for indigence status. By order dated January 10, 2000, we affirmed the trial court's order when we concluded the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining the contests to appellants' affidavits its. We also ordered appellants to file, within ten days from the date of the Order, written verification that they had paid, or made arrangements to pay, the clerk's and reporter's fees. We warned appellant that failure to timely file the verification may result in the dismissal of this appeal. By letter tiled January 18, 2000, appellants advised this Court that they were unable to obtain a loan or money from friends for the cost of the reporter' record. Their correspondence also indicated that they were unable to work out a payment plan with the district clerk to pay the clerk's fee.

On February 16, 2000, the Clerk of this Court received written notice from the district clerk that the clerk's record had been prepared, but was being held pending the tender of the $270 clerk's fee. By letter dated February 16, 2000, the Clerk of this Court advised appellants of the district clerk's notice, and directed appellants to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee within ten days of the date of the letter. Appellants were cautioned that failure to comply with this directive may result in the dismissal of their appeal.

By letter dated March 8, 2000 the Clerk advised appellants that they had still not complied with this Court's January 10th Order and tire February 16th Clerk's letter. The March 8th letter directed appellants to file th written verification specified in our January 16th Order within ten days from the date of the letter. This time the Clerk warned appellants that the appeal "will be dismissed without further notice" if they did not comply with this directive. See TEX.Rs.APP.P. 37.3(b) 42.3 (c).

To date, appellants have still Trot complied with our January 10th Order or the Clerk's February 16th directive by advising us whether they have paid, or made arrangement to pay, for the clerk's and reporter's records. Our appellate rules clearly require the appellant to bear the cost of these records unless they are found to be indigent. See TEX.Rs.APP.P. 37.3 (b). To date, neither the clerks record nor the reporter's records have been filed because appellants have not paid or made arrangements to pay the requisite fees.

For these reasons, on the Court's own motion, this appeal is DISMISSED. See TEX.Rs.APP.P. 37.3 (b) 42.3 (c).


Summaries of

In re J.W

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas
Apr 26, 2000
49 S.W.3d 7 (Tex. App. 2000)
Case details for

In re J.W

Case Details

Full title:In the Interests of J.W. and D.S.G. Minor Children

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas

Date published: Apr 26, 2000

Citations

49 S.W.3d 7 (Tex. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

In re J.W

See In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737 (Tex. 1998) (per curiam). 49 S.W.3d 7 (Tex.App.-Dallas, Jan. 10, 2000…

In re B.N

The court of appeals affirmed the indigence ruling and ultimately dismissed the appeal because the appellants…