From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Juul Labs, Mktg. Sales Practice & Prods. Liab. Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 6, 2023
3:19-MD-2913-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2023)

Opinion

3:19-MD-2913-WHO

01-06-2023

IN RE JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING SALES PRACTICE AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to All Plaintiffs Identified in Exhibits A and B Plaintiff Case Name Case Number Counsel Date MTD Filed MTD ECF Number Case Case Date MTD with Prejudice Filed MTD ECF Number


[PROPOSED] CONSOLIDATED ORDER GRANTING JLI'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT DISCOVERY REQUIRED BY CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NOS. 8 AND 13 AND JLI'S MOTION TO CONVERT ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The Honorable William H. Orrick, United States District Judge

This Document Relates To: All Actions

Before the Court are (1) the Motion by Defendant Juul Labs, Inc. to Dismiss the Complaints filed by all plaintiffs identified in Exhibit A (the “Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. Nos. 3417, 3428, 3434, 3464, 3486, 3604, and 3632) and (2) the Motion by Defendant Juul Labs, Inc. to Convert Order of Dismissal without Prejudice to Order of Dismissal with Prejudice for all plaintiff identified in Exhibit B (the “Motion to Convert”) (Dkt. No. 3435) in the above referenced, consolidated actions. Having considered the motions and arguments of the parties, and with good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby (1) GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSES the Complaints filed by all plaintiffs identified in Exhibit A without prejudice, and (2) GRANTS the Motion to Convert and DISMISSES the Complaints filed by all plaintiffs identified in Exhibit B with prejudice.

The Plaintiffs identified in Dkt. Nos. 3386 and 3510 have voluntarily dismissed their cases or submitted Plaintiff Fact Sheets. Accordingly, Dkt. Nos. 3386 and 3510 are TERMINATED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit A

Count

Plaintiff

Case Name

Case

Number

Counsel

Date MTD Filed

MTD

ECF Number

1.

Weber, William Leonard

William Leonard Weber v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

3:22-cv-02399

Hare, Wynn, Newell & Newton, LLP

8/22/2022

3417

2.

Lambert, Hunter

Hunter Lambert v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

3:22-cv-02397

Pulaski Kherkher, PLLC

8/29/2022

3428

3.

Mills, Dominic

Dominic Mills v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

3:22-cv-02428

Pulaski Kherkher, PLLC

8/29/2022

3428

4.

Christoph, Russell

Russell Christoph v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

3:22-cv-02471

Pulaski Kherkher, PLLC

8/29/2022

3428

5.

Coker, Ashten

Ashten Coker v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

3:22-cv-02484

Pulaski Kherkher, PLLC

8/29/2022

3428

6.

Ferreira, Matheus

Matheus Ferreira v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

3:22-cv-02722

Pulaski Kherkher, PLLC

9/13/2022

3464

7.

Yee, Luke

Luke Yee v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

3:22-cv-02759

Napoli Shkolnik PLLC

9/19/2022

3486

8.

Jimenez, Dave

Dave Jimenez v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al

3:22-cv-03212

Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, LLC

10/17/2022

3604

9.

Zenith

Academy East

Zenith Academy East v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al

3:22-cv-03307

Frantz Law Group, APLC

10/24/2022

3632

Exhibit B

Count

Case Number

Case

Plaintiff

Counsel

Date MTD with Prejudice Filed

MTD ECF Number

1.

3:21-cv-10087

Kadie Jones v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

Jones, Kadie

TorHoerman Law, LLC

5/9/2022

3169

2.

3:21-cv-10090

Morgan Overstreet v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

Overstreet, Morgan

TorHoerman Law, LLC

5/9/2022

3169

3.

3:21-cv-10091

Maureen Dwelley v. Juu.

Labs, Inc. et al.

Dwelley, Maureen

TorHoerman Law, LLC

5/9/2022

3169

4.

3:21-cv-09425

Layanna Ahrens v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

Ahrens, Layanna

Fears Nachawati, PLLC

4/18/2022

3043

5.

3:21-cv-09491

Alex Sheehan v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

Sheehan, Alex

Goldenberg Law, PLLC

4/18/2022

3043

6.

3:21-cv-09534

America Hechavarria v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

Hechavarria, America

Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, LLC

4/18/2022

3043

7.

3:21-cv-09571

Jalin A.

Howell- Foster v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

Howell-Foster, Jalin A.

Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, LLC

4/18/2022

3043

8.

3:21-cv-09631

Chevy Lee Paul Huff v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

Huff, Chevy Lee Paul

Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, LLC

4/25/2022

3054

9.

3:21-cv-09678

Alize Potasz v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

Potasz, Alize

Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, LLC

4/25/2022

3054

10.

3:21-cv-09679

Tyler Currie v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

Currie, Tyler

Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, LLC

4/25/2022

3054

11.

3:21-cv-09695

Joshua Sanders v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al

Sanders, Joshua

Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, LLC

4/25/2022

3054

12.

3:21-cv-09724

Elizabeth-Grace

Dickey v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al

Dickey, Elizabeth-Grace

Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, LLC

4/25/2022

3054

13.

3:21-cv-09749

J.K v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al.

J.K.

Giskan Solotaroff & Anderson

LLP

4/25/2022

3054


Summaries of

In re Juul Labs, Mktg. Sales Practice & Prods. Liab. Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 6, 2023
3:19-MD-2913-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2023)
Case details for

In re Juul Labs, Mktg. Sales Practice & Prods. Liab. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING SALES PRACTICE AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 6, 2023

Citations

3:19-MD-2913-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2023)