Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. A-636566
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
*THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 13, 2010, and not certified for publication, be modified as follows:
1. On page 2, the first sentence of the first paragraph states: “Margo Johnson filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking an order overturning the Governor’s 2009 decision to reverse the Board of Parole Hearings Board’s (the Board) 2009 order granting Johnson parole, and reinstating of the Board’s parole release order.”
It should state: “Margo Johnson filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking an order overturning the Governor’s 2009 decision to reverse the decision of the Board of Parole Hearings (the Board) finding Johnson suitable for parole, and reinstating of the Board’s parole release order.”
2. On page 6, at line 5 of the last paragraph, remove the following exhibit references: “(Pet. Exh. AA; Pet. Exh. BB.)”
3. On page 6, at line 12, the opinion states “... she worked as a peer advisory and counselor....”
It should read: “... she worked as a peer advisor and counselor....”
4. On page 7, at lines 14-15, the last sentence states “The 2005 report was fully supportive of her release, and noted her active involvement in substantive abuse programs.”
It should read: “The 2005 report was fully supportive of her release, and noted her active involvement in substance abuse programs.”
5. On pages 13 and 14, references to “Pen. Code § 2402” should read “§ 2402.”
6. On page 18, second line of the second paragraph reads: “(Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, Pen. Code § 2402, subd. (d)(3); Shaputis, supra, 44 Cal.4th at p. 1246.)”
It should read: “(§ 2402, subd. (d)(3); Shaputis, supra, 44 Cal.4th at p. 1246.)”
7. On page 20, second sentence of the second paragraph reads: “It is not uncommon for inmates to....”
It should read: “It is not uncommon for an inmate to....”
8. On page 30, the first sentence at the top of the page reads: “However, as we have discussed elsewhere, the Governor’s contention that Johnson lacks insight and has failed to accept responsibility for her actions is not reasonable based on the record that was before the Governor.”
It should read: “However, as we have discussed elsewhere, the Governor’s contention that Johnson lacks insight and has failed to accept responsibility for her actions is not reasonably based on the record that was before the Governor.”
The foregoing does not change the judgment.
PERLUSS, P. J., WOODS, J.