Summary
intervening procedural history and citation omitted
Summary of this case from Spring Street Partners-IV, L.P. v. LamOpinion
No. 09-11149.
September 14, 2010.
Susan Mary Halpern, The Halpern Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Colin George Martin, Stacy R. Obenhaus, Gardere Wynne Sewell, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 2:08-CV-130-J.
Appellants appeal from the judgment of the District Court which affirmed the judgment of the Bankruptcy Court which found fraud, fraudulent transfer, and pierced the corporate veil to award damages against the Appellants. Appellants complain of the standing of the Appellee to bring the claims in the Bankruptcy Court based on their argument that the purchase agreement was not assigned to Appellee. They also raise a number of issues relating to the finding of fraud, the decision of the Bankruptcy Court to pierce the corporate veil, and to find the individuals liable. They also challenge the amount of the award and the decision of the Bankruptcy Court that did not allow the individual Defendants to attack a Delaware judgment against JNS Aviation.
We have carefully considered the arguments on appeal and have reviewed the record. After a de novo review of the legal determination of the Bankruptcy Court and review for clear error of the factual findings of the Bankruptcy Court, we affirm the judgment of the Bankruptcy Court. No error has been shown which would require reversal. Accordingly, the judgment on appeal is in all respects AFFIRMED.