From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re J.M

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 14, 2010
127 Ohio St. 3d 8 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-1589.

Submitted July 6, 2010.

Decided October 14, 2010.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Pike County, No. 08CA782, 2010-Ohio-1484.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Angela Miller, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, J.M.


{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal was accepted in this case on Proposition of Law No. I and held for the decision in State v. Arnold, 126 Ohio St.3d 290, 2010-Ohio-2742, 933 N.E.2d 775.

{¶ 2} We are unable to determine from the court of appeals' opinion whether the juvenile court erroneously admitted statements by the child victim to child advocacy center employees. It is uncertain whether the statements were made for forensic or medical purposes and, if the statements were made for forensic purposes, whether their admission was harmless error. Accordingly, the portion of the court of appeals' judgment with respect to appellant J.M.'s third assignment of error is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with State v. Arnold.

PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

BROWN, C.J., concurs in judgment only.

O'DONNELL, J., concurs in the judgment to vacate the judgment of the court of appeals in part but would remand for application of the principles articulated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Arnold.


Summaries of

In re J.M

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 14, 2010
127 Ohio St. 3d 8 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

In re J.M

Case Details

Full title:IN RE J.M

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 14, 2010

Citations

127 Ohio St. 3d 8 (Ohio 2010)
2010 Ohio 4935

Citing Cases

State v. Lawson

Because Freihofer did not express an opinion about the children's credibility, no improper vouching occurred.…