From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re J.F.

California Court of Appeals, Second District, First Division
Feb 23, 2009
No. B206342 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2009)

Opinion


In re J.F., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. J.F., Defendant and Appellant. B206342 California Court of Appeal, Second District, First Division February 23, 2009

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. JJ14526, Robert Ambrose, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.).

Courtney M. Selan, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Keith H. Borjon, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and John R. Gorey, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

MALLANO, P. J.

J.F. appeals from the order continuing wardship entered following a finding at a contested adjudication that he committed burglary on October 15, 2007, when he and an accomplice broke the door of an apartment unit, entered the apartment, and took items of personal property that were inside. At the disposition hearing, the minor was ordered suitably placed. Terms and conditions of probation that had been imposed in conjunction with a December 4, 2006 order of wardship (based on a finding of vandalism) were ordered to remain in full force and effect, as modified. One of the December 4 conditions of probation that was not modified (No. 15) required that the minor not associate with anyone disapproved of by his parents or probation officer.

The minor contends, and the Attorney General aptly concedes, that under In re Sheena K. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 875, 879, 890, this condition should be modified to include a requirement that the minor know of his parents’ or probation officer’s disapproval. We shall so order.

DISPOSITION

The order continuing wardship is affirmed. The juvenile court is directed to modify condition of probation No. 15 to provide that the minor not associate with anyone known by him to be disapproved of by his parents or his probation officer.

We concur: ROTHSCHILD, J., BAUER, J.

Judge of the Orange County Superior Court assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.


Summaries of

In re J.F.

California Court of Appeals, Second District, First Division
Feb 23, 2009
No. B206342 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2009)
Case details for

In re J.F.

Case Details

Full title:In re J.F., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, First Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2009

Citations

No. B206342 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2009)