From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IN RE JEYS

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Tenth Circuit
Oct 28, 1996
202 B.R. 153 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 1996)

Opinion

BAP No. UT-96-31

Filed October 28, 1996

Before PUSATERI, ROSE, and CORNISH, Bankruptcy Judges.


Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah Bankr. No. 96-21393.


CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL


Tim S. Jeys ("Debtor") is the debtor and appellant in the above-captioned bankruptcy proceeding. The Panel has received and reviewed the Debtor's "Motion to Proceed In Forma Papus [sic] and Affidavit of Impecuniosity."

Leave to prosecute an action in forma pauperis is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, which provides that such leave may be granted by a "court of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The term "court of the United States" is defined by 28 U.S.C. § 451. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that "court of the United States," as used in 28 U.S.C. § 451, is limited to Article III courts. Jones v. Bank of Santa Fe (In re Courtesy Inns, Ltd., Inc.), 40 F.3d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir. 1994). The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is not an Article III court, and therefore lacks the power to grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Courtesy Inns, 40 F.3d at 1086 (bankruptcy courts are not Article III courts); Perroton v. Gray (In re Perroton), 958 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1992) (bankruptcy courts do not have the power to grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Debtor's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The Debtor shall pay the appeal filing fee to the bankruptcy court within TEN (10) days of the date of this order, or this appeal will be DISMISSED.

For the Panel: Barbara A. Schermerhorn, Clerk of Court

By: Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

IN RE JEYS

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Tenth Circuit
Oct 28, 1996
202 B.R. 153 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

IN RE JEYS

Case Details

Full title:IN RE TIM S. JEYS, Debtor. TIM S. JEYS, Appellant

Court:United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Oct 28, 1996

Citations

202 B.R. 153 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

In re Del Rio

        Contrary to Hardy, circuits other than the Eleventh considering the authority of the bankruptcy court…

In re Stansbury

We note, however, that a few courts have joined those cited by the USTE, see page 361-62 supra, as holding…