From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ja.O.

Supreme Court of California
Jul 26, 2023
310 Cal. Rptr. 3d 728 (Cal. 2023)

Opinion

S280572

07-26-2023

IN RE JA.O.


The petition for review is granted.

Pending review, the opinion of the Court of Appeal, which is currently published at 91 Cal.App.5th 672, 308 Cal.Rptr.3d 596, may be cited, not only for its persuasive value, but also for the limited purpose of establishing the existence of a conflict in authority that would in turn allow trial courts to exercise discretion under Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 456, 20 Cal.Rptr. 321, 369 P.2d 937, to choose between sides of any such conflict. (See Standing Order Exercising Authority Under California Rules of Court, Rule 8.1115(e)(3), Upon Grant of Review or Transfer of a Matter with an Underlying Published Court of Appeal Opinion, Administrative Order 2021-04-21; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(e)(3) and corresponding Comment, par. 2.)

Votes: Guerrero, C.J., Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban, Jenkins and Evans, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Ja.O.

Supreme Court of California
Jul 26, 2023
310 Cal. Rptr. 3d 728 (Cal. 2023)
Case details for

In re Ja.O.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE Ja.O.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 26, 2023

Citations

310 Cal. Rptr. 3d 728 (Cal. 2023)
532 P.3d 733

Citing Cases

San Bernardino Cnty. Children & Family Servs. v. H.J. (In re A.J.)

Our Supreme Court is reviewing the issue. (In re Ja.O. (2023) 310 Cal.Rptr.3d…

Riverside Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs. v. Jeremy H. (In re Winter L.)

Our Supreme Court is reviewing the issue. (In re Ja.O. (2023) 310 Cal.Rptr.3d 728.) We need not decide…