From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re James v. Commissioner of Labor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 11, 2007
36 A.D.3d 1041 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 500778.

January 11, 2007.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 1, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

James R. Bender, Endicott, appellant pro se.

Levene, Gouldin Thompson, Binghamton (Jason M. Carlton of counsel), for Olums of Binghamton, Inc., respondent.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Mary Hughes of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ.


From October 2002 through April 2005, claimant worked for a furniture retailer as a refinisher in the warehouse shop. He was discharged after he attempted to steal a mattress pad from the warehouse. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied his claim for unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he was discharged for misconduct. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. It is well settled that an employee's apparent dishonesty may constitute disqualifying misconduct ( see Matter of Smith [Commissioner of Labor], 23 AD3d 973, 974; Matter of Olmstead [Commissioner of Labor], 8 AD3d 727, 728). Here, the employer's representatives testified that claimant was observed on a surveillance videotape with a mattress pad under his coat in the vestibule area where the employees punched in and out of work. They stated that when the pad fell out from underneath claimant's coat, he left it in the vestibule area and walked away. It may reasonably be inferred from such testimony that claimant attempted to steal the mattress pad and, consequently, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that he was terminated for misconduct. Claimant's testimony that he did not intend to steal the mattress pad but was going to make an inquiry about purchasing it presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve ( see Matter of Olmstead [Commissioner of Labor], supra at 728).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re James v. Commissioner of Labor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 11, 2007
36 A.D.3d 1041 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re James v. Commissioner of Labor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JAMES R. BENDER, Appellant. OLUMS OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 11, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 1041 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 188
826 N.Y.S.2d 843

Citing Cases

In re Singleton

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant,…

In re Andreani

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that she was disqualified from receiving…