From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jahkayia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 2008
48 A.D.3d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 2006-11002, 2006-11003.

February 1, 2008.

In two neglect proceedings, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ross, J.H.O.), dated November 2, 2006, as extended the placement of Donnell E.M., in effect, until April 24, 2007, and conditioned visitation upon his consent, and (2) so much of an order of the same court also dated November 2, 2006, as extended the placement of Jahkayia M., in effect, until April 24, 2007, and conditioned visitation upon her consent.

Jeffrey C. Bluth, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Leonard Koerner and Elizabeth S. Natrella of counsel), for respondent.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Diane Pazar of counsel), Law Guardian for the children.

Before: Crane, J.P., Rivera, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ.


Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The orders that are the subject of these appeals have been superseded by subsequent orders dated May 29, 2007 from which no appeals have been taken. Accordingly, the appeals must be dismissed as academic ( see Matter of Kidra L., 18 AD3d 552).


Summaries of

In re Jahkayia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 2008
48 A.D.3d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Jahkayia

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAHKAYIA M. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 955
850 N.Y.S.2d 902

Citing Cases

In re Michael F.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The order that is the subject of this…

In re Joseph A.

The visitation order that is the subject of this appeal has been superseded by a subsequent visitation order…