Opinion
M-741
April 30, 2002.
Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department. Respondent, as Herbert Mordecai Jacobi, was admitted to the Bar at a Term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court for the Second Judicial Department on March 22, 1967.
Raymond Vallejo, of counsel (Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel) for petitioner.
Douglas T. Burns, attorney for respondent.
Before: Saxe, J.P., Buckley, Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ellerin, JJ.
Respondent, Herbert M. Jacobi, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on March 22, 1967, as Herbert Mordechai Jacobi. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b), striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys on the ground that he has been disbarred upon his conviction of a felony as defined by Judiciary Law § 90(4)(e).
In an indictment filed on September 28, 2001, respondent was charged in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York with, inter alia, conspiring to receive stolen government records (count one) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 641 and making false statements to the FBI (count five) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2), both felonies. On October 17, 2001, pursuant to a plea agreement executed on October 12, 2001, respondent pled guilty to counts one and five of the indictment. On January 18, 2002, respondent was sentenced to three years probation on each count to run concurrently and a fine of $10,000.
On October 23, 2001, respondent submitted his resignation to the Disciplinary Committee. Respondent's resignation can not be accepted since his disbarment was automatic and effective upon his conviction (Matter of Merola, 131 A.D.2d 58). Respondent does not oppose the relief sought on the current motion.
The Federal crime of conspiring to receive stolen government records in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 641 is essentially similar to the New York felony of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45) and, consequently, provides a proper predicate for respondent's automatic disbarment under Judiciary Law § 90(4)(a) (see, Matter of Margiotta, 60 N.Y.2d 147, 149). During his plea allocution, respondent admitted that between March and June 2001, he knowingly agreed with others to receive and review stolen FBI records, the value of which exceeded $1000, with the intent to convert them to his own use or gain, or that of his client. Conviction of conspiring to receive stolen Federal government records is a sufficient predicate for automatic disbarment (see: Matter of Landan, 231 A.D.2d 303;Matter of Best, 126 A.D.2d 286).
Accordingly, the petition should be granted and respondent's name stricken from the rolls of attorneys in the State of New York pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b).
All concur.