In re Jackson

Full title: IN RE JAMES BELL JACKSON, RELATOR

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Dec 30, 2010

No. 02-10-00445-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 30, 2010)

Opinion

No. 02-10-00445-CV

Delivered: December 30, 2010.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING.

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MEIER, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ¹

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

PER CURIAM.

Relator James Bell Jackson seeks a writ of mandamus compelling a district clerk to file a motion Relator wants filed with the trial court. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

This court has jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus against district and county court judges, to issue writs of mandamus against a district judge acting as magistrate in a court of inquiry, and to issue all other writs necessary to enforce its own jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004). We do not have mandamus jurisdiction over a district clerk unless such is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See, e.g., In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st] 1999) (mem. op.); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1998). Here, mandamus is not necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Washington, 7 S.W.3d at 182-83. Therefore, we dismiss Relator's petition for want of jurisdiction.