From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Dec 5, 2011
Case No. 5:11-md-02250-LHK (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 5:11-md-02250-LHK

12-05-2011

In re: iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP James F. McCabe Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC., a California corporation DURIE TANGRI LLP Michael H. Page DURIE TANGRI LLP MICHAEL H. PAGE JOSEPH C. GRATZ GENEVIEVE P. ROSLOFF Attorneys for Defendant ADMOB, INC. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP GAIL E. LEES S. ASHLIE BERINGER JOSHUA A. JESSEN GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Attorneys for Defendants FLURRY, INC. COOLEY LLP MICHAEL G. RHODES MATTHEW D. BROWN COOLEY LLP Attorneys for Defendants ADMARVEL, INC. KAMBERLAW, LLC Scott A. Kamber SCOTT A. KAMBER ( pro hac vice ) DAVID A. STAMPLEY ( pro hac vice ) KAMBERLAW, LLC DEBORAH KRAVITZ (SBN 275661) KAMBERLAW, LLP INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS WILLIAM AUDET JONAS P. MANN MICHAEL A. MCSHANE AUDET & PARTNERS LLP LIAISON COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS JAY EDELSON SEAN REIS EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLC RICHARD A. LOCKRIDGE ROBERT K. SHELQUIST LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P. JEFF S. WESTERMAN MILBERG LLP PETER E. SEIDMAN ANDREI V. RADO ANNE MARIE VU (Bar No. 238771) MILBERG LLP JEREMY WILSON WILSON TROSCLAIR & LOVINS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR CONSOLIDATED PLAINTIFFS


JAMES F. MCCABE (CA SBN 104686)

BRYAN WILSON (CA SBN 138842)

TERESA N. BURLISON (CA SBN 230854) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC., a California Corporation

JOINT STIPULATION

REGARDING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS'

MOTIONS TO DISMISS

WHEREAS, on September 20, 2011, the Court granted Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Class Action Complaint for lack of Article III standing, with leave to amend. (Dkt No. 8).

WHEREAS, on October 5, 2011, following a case management conference on that same date, the Court issued a minute order directing Plaintiffs to file their First Amended Consolidated Complaint by November 21, 2011, and requiring the parties to file a stipulation regarding the briefing schedule for "Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss." (Dkt. No. 21).

WHEREAS, on November 21, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (Dkt. No. 25) and, on November 22, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a substantively identical corrected version of the same ("First Amended Consolidated Complaint") (Dkt. No. 26).

WHEREAS, the First Amended Consolidated Complaint adds several new causes of action, removes several causes of action, and adds two new party defendants: Google, Inc. ("Google") and Medialets, Inc. ("Medialets").

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2011, the Court issued summonses for Google and Medialets.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs seek to serve Google and Medialets as soon as practicable.

WHEREAS, as with the last round of dispositive briefing in this case, the Defendants (at least, those who have been served and made a first appearance) intend to try and coordinate the filing of consolidated motions to dismiss rather than separate motions, for the convenience of the Court and all parties.

WHEREAS, Defendants need sufficient time to coordinate and exchange motion drafts, including with any new parties that might be served, and believe that the proposed schedule will provide adequate time to so coordinate amongst existing and new Defendants.

THEREFORE, pursuant to the Court's October 5, 2011 Order, and subject to the approval of the Court, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that:

1. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss shall be filed and served not later than January 10, 2012.
2. Plaintiffs' Oppositions shall be filed and served not later than February 15, 2012.

3. Defendants' Replies shall be filed and served not later than March 2, 2012. Defendants shall secure from the Court a date for hearing at the time the motion is filed.

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

James F. McCabe

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC., a California corporation

DURIE TANGRI LLP

Michael H. Page

DURIE TANGRI LLP

MICHAEL H. PAGE

JOSEPH C. GRATZ

GENEVIEVE P. ROSLOFF

Attorneys for Defendant

ADMOB, INC.

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

GAIL E. LEES

S. ASHLIE BERINGER

JOSHUA A. JESSEN

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

FLURRY, INC.

COOLEY LLP

MICHAEL G. RHODES

MATTHEW D. BROWN

COOLEY LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

ADMARVEL, INC.

KAMBERLAW, LLC

Scott A. Kamber

SCOTT A. KAMBER (pro hac vice)

DAVID A. STAMPLEY (pro hac vice)

KAMBERLAW, LLC

DEBORAH KRAVITZ (SBN 275661)

KAMBERLAW, LLP

INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

WILLIAM AUDET

JONAS P. MANN

MICHAEL A. MCSHANE

AUDET & PARTNERS LLP

LIAISON COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS

JAY EDELSON

SEAN REIS

EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLC

RICHARD A. LOCKRIDGE

ROBERT K. SHELQUIST

LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P.

JEFF S. WESTERMAN

MILBERG LLP

PETER E. SEIDMAN

ANDREI V. RADO

ANNE MARIE VU (Bar No. 238771)

MILBERG LLP

JEREMY WILSON

WILSON TROSCLAIR & LOVINS

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR

CONSOLIDATED PLAINTIFFS

GENERAL ATTESTATION

I, James F. McCabe, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that all persons signing this stipulation have concurred in this filing.

James F. McCabe PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

The Honorable Lucy H. Koh

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

In re iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Dec 5, 2011
Case No. 5:11-md-02250-LHK (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2011)
Case details for

In re iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re: iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 5, 2011

Citations

Case No. 5:11-md-02250-LHK (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2011)

Citing Cases

Flextronics International, Ltd. v. Technology

Cal. Penal Code § 502. In re iPhone Application Litig., Case No. 5:11-md-02250-LHK, 2011 WL 4403963, at (N.D.…

In re Google, Inc. Privacy Policy Litigation

Therefore, Plaintiffs need not allege a direct sale between Google and themselves to establish their CLRA…