From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Interest of J.T.H.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 18, 2019
No. 04-19-00515-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2019)

Opinion

No. 04-19-00515-CV

12-18-2019

In the Interest of J.T.H.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2018-PA-01512
Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Irene Rios, Justice Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED

This is an appeal from a judgment terminating appellant's parental rights to his child, J.T.H. Appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief. In the brief, counsel discusses the applicable law and examines the record in this case. After examining the record, counsel concludes this appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel's brief satisfies the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). See In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (noting Anders procedures apply in parental termination cases).

Counsel's motion to withdraw states that appellant was provided a copy of the Anders brief and advised of his right to request the record and file a pro se brief. We issued an order notifying appellant that he had the right to request the record and file a pro se brief. Appellant did not request the record or file a pro se brief.

After conducting an independent evaluation of the record, we agree this appeal is frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment. Nevertheless, we deny counsel's motion to withdraw because it fails to demonstrate good cause for counsel to withdraw. See id. at 27 & n.7 (providing that once counsel is appointed in a parental termination case he "should be permitted to withdraw only for good cause . . . ."). Counsel's obligation to his client extends through the exhaustion or waiver of all appeals. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.016(3)(B); In re P.M. 520 S.W.3d at 27. If appellant desires to pursue this appeal to the Texas Supreme Court, counsel may satisfy his obligation "by filing a petition for review that satisfies the standards for an Anders brief." See In re P.M. 520 S.W.3d at 27-28 & n.14.

Irene Rios, Justice


Summaries of

In re Interest of J.T.H.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 18, 2019
No. 04-19-00515-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2019)
Case details for

In re Interest of J.T.H.

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of J.T.H.

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Dec 18, 2019

Citations

No. 04-19-00515-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2019)