From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re C.D.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Apr 2, 2020
NO. 09-20-00063-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 2, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 09-20-00063-CV

04-02-2020

IN THE INTEREST OF C.D.


On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. C-236,786

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this appeal, C.D., C.B.'s mother, filed a notice of appeal from a temporary court order the trial court signed following a hearing in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship (SAPCR). After Mother's attorney filed the notice, we questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal. In a letter the Court sent to the parties, we asked the parties to file written responses explaining the statute or rule that provided this Court with jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the trial court's interlocutory order. The parties' responses were due on March 16, 2020. In the same letter, we warned the parties we would dismiss the appeal unless they established the Court could exercise jurisdiction over the appeal.

None of the parties filed a response. Moreover, the trial court's interlocutory order is not appealable. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 105.001(e). We may dismiss Mother's appeal because Mother has not shown she is seeking to appeal form an order that is appealable at this time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Submitted on April 1, 2020
Opinion Delivered April 2, 2020 Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

In re C.D.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Apr 2, 2020
NO. 09-20-00063-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 2, 2020)
Case details for

In re C.D.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF C.D.

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Apr 2, 2020

Citations

NO. 09-20-00063-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 2, 2020)