From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Estate of Bankston

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Aug 30, 2018
NO. 09-18-00155-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 09-18-00155-CV

08-30-2018

IN THE ESTATE OF FREDERICK BANKSTON


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 15-33174-P

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 2, 2018, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record. The appellant, Sharita Jones, did not file a response. It appears that the appellant did not file a statement of inability to afford payment of costs and is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

/s/_________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice Submitted on August 29, 2018
Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Estate of Bankston

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Aug 30, 2018
NO. 09-18-00155-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2018)
Case details for

In re Estate of Bankston

Case Details

Full title:IN THE ESTATE OF FREDERICK BANKSTON

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Aug 30, 2018

Citations

NO. 09-18-00155-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2018)