From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Part 60 RMBS Putback Litig.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 13, 2018
166 A.D.3d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

7580 Index 777000/15, 779000/15

11-13-2018

IN RE PART 60 RMBS PUTBACK LITIGATION In re Part 60 RMBS Monoline Insurer Litigation

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York (Richard A. Jacobsen of counsel), for appellants. McKool Smith, P.C., New York (Zachary W. Mazin of counsel), for respondents.


Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York (Richard A. Jacobsen of counsel), for appellants.

McKool Smith, P.C., New York (Zachary W. Mazin of counsel), for respondents.

Sweeny, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Gische, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the appellants in the Putback and Monoline actions from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered October 13, 2017,

And said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the order so appealed from

be and the same is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated by Marcy Friedman, J., with costs.


Summaries of

In re Part 60 RMBS Putback Litig.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 13, 2018
166 A.D.3d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

In re Part 60 RMBS Putback Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re Part 60 RMBS Putback Litigation In re Part 60 RMBS Monoline Insurer…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 13, 2018

Citations

166 A.D.3d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 7659
85 N.Y.S.3d 761