From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Homan

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 12, 2008
195 N.J. 185 (N.J. 2008)

Opinion

June 12, 2008.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-311, concluding that WARREN W. HOMAN of CARNEYS POINT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1966, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 3.4(b) (falsifying evidence), RPC 8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact to disciplinary authorities), RPC 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WARREN W. HOMAN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Homan

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 12, 2008
195 N.J. 185 (N.J. 2008)
Case details for

In re Homan

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF WARREN W. HOMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 12, 2008

Citations

195 N.J. 185 (N.J. 2008)
948 A.2d 1268

Citing Cases

In re Doyle

Additionally, the OAE analogized respondent's acts of deception, in connection with his reproduction of…

In re Yannon

See, e.g., In re DeSeno, 205 N.J. 91 (2011) (attorney reprimanded for misrepresenting to the district ethics…