From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Holmes

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Oct 9, 2008
No. 13-08-00578-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2008)

Opinion

No. 13-08-00578-CV

Opinion delivered and Filed October 9, 2008.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).


Relator, Billy Holmes a/k/a Billy Richards, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on October 8, 2008, asking us to direct the trial court to file his pleadings. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. It is the relator's burden to provide this Court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d 659, 660 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2008, orig. proceeding). The petition generally fails to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3 and fails to include either an appendix or a record. See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j)(1), 52.7. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See id. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Holmes

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Oct 9, 2008
No. 13-08-00578-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2008)
Case details for

In re Holmes

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: BILLY HOLMES A/K/A BILLY RICHARDS

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Oct 9, 2008

Citations

No. 13-08-00578-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2008)