From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Holler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-383 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-383

08-14-2012

In re: PAUL T. HOLLER and PHILOMENA HOLLER, Debtors.


BANKRUPTCY APPEAL


ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the Brief of Appellant, NOVA Bank, and the Brief of Appellees, Paul T. Holler and Philomena B. Holler, and for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum dated August 14, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Bankruptcy Court's December 13, 2011 Order Denying NOVA's Motion for Reconsideration is AFFIRMED.

2. The appeal is DISMISSED.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

BY THE COURT:

___________

Berle M. Schiller , J.


Summaries of

In re Holler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-383 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2012)
Case details for

In re Holler

Case Details

Full title:In re: PAUL T. HOLLER and PHILOMENA HOLLER, Debtors.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 14, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-383 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2012)

Citing Cases

Distefano v. Endurance Am. Ins. Co.

As Endurance points out, "the four-part test proffered by [DiStefano] was merely one of three [alternative]…