From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Holland

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Sep 28, 2012
No. 05-12-01185-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 28, 2012)

Opinion

No. 05-12-01185-CV

09-28-2012

IN RE RICKEY L. HOLLAND AND KAREN HOLLAND, Relators


Writ of Mandamus Denied,

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-15867-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Fillmore

Opinion by Justice Bridges

Relators contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to recuse. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief.

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE

121185F.P05


Summaries of

In re Holland

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Sep 28, 2012
No. 05-12-01185-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 28, 2012)
Case details for

In re Holland

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RICKEY L. HOLLAND AND KAREN HOLLAND, Relators

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Sep 28, 2012

Citations

No. 05-12-01185-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 28, 2012)