From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hoeflinger-Hotchkiss

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Feb 12, 2020
No. 04-19-00872-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 12, 2020)

Opinion

No. 04-19-00872-CV

02-12-2020

IN RE SuEllen HOEFLINGER-HOTCHKISS


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Original Mandamus Proceeding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018PC0587, styled In the Estate of Gregory Lyle Hotchkiss a/k/a Gregory L. Hotchkiss, Deceased, pending in the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Oscar J. Kazen presiding.

On December 17, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On January 21, 2020, the real parties in interest filed a response. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the petition, the response, and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

In re Hoeflinger-Hotchkiss

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Feb 12, 2020
No. 04-19-00872-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 12, 2020)
Case details for

In re Hoeflinger-Hotchkiss

Case Details

Full title:IN RE SuEllen HOEFLINGER-HOTCHKISS

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Feb 12, 2020

Citations

No. 04-19-00872-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 12, 2020)