Opinion
19-cv-02573-EMC 2066
07-14-2023
IN RE HIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
ORDER DENYING IHPPS' MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge.
In light of the jury verdict, the Court DENIES the IHPPs' motion for a permanent injunction against Teva. See Mot. at 1 n.1 (“recogniz[ing] that in light of the Jury's verdict, the Court will likely deny this Motion under Ninth Circuit precedent”); see also Teutscher v. Woodson, 835 F.3d 936, 944 (9th Cir. 2016) (“Because the Seventh Amendment's second clause ‘prohibit[s] . . . the courts of the United States to re-examine any facts tried by a jury' except as permitted under the narrow ‘modes known to the common law,' the court then must abide by the jury's findings of fact in making any subsequent rulings.”). The Court does not rule on Teva's claim that the IHPPs waived the right to equitable relief.
This order disposes of Docket No. 2066.
IT IS SO ORDERED.