Opinion
NO. 02-12-00327-CV
08-13-2012
IN RE ERIC RANDALL HINKLE RELATOR
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that the petition should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (holding that the court of criminal appeals is the "only court with jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings"); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.) ("[W]hile the courts of appeals have mandamus jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings."). Accordingly, relator's petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and WALKER, JJ.
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).