From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hildebrand

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 11, 2023
23-cv-01303 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 11, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-01303 BLF (PR)

05-11-2023

IN RE MICHAEL HILDEBRAND, Petitioner.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION AND IN FORMA PA UPERIS APPLICATION

(Docket No. 7)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 21, 2023, Petitioner filed a letter addressed to Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins which was construed as an attempt to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. No. 1. On the same date, the Clerk of this Court sent Petitioner a notice that this action was deficient because he did not submit a completed petition on the proper form; Petitioner was directed to file a completed petition within twenty-eight days or the matter would be dismissed. Dkt. No. 2. The Clerk also sent Petitioner a separate notice that he did not pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application; Petitioner was directed to file an IFP application within twenty-eight days of the notice in order to proceed with this action or face dismissal. Dkt. No. 3. Lastly, Petitioner was also sent a notice of assignment of this case to a Magistrate Judge; he was directed to file a consent or declination. Dkt. No. 4. The matter was reassigned to the Undersigned on April 28, 2023, after no response was received from Petitioner to any of the notices. Dkt. No. 6.

Petitioner has recently filed a letter, which indicates that he may not have received the two Clerk's notices regarding the filing of a complete petition and the IFP application. Dkt. No. 7. In the interest of justice, the Court will sua sponte grant Petitioner an extension of time to file a proper petition and resolve the fee matter. Petitioner shall file a complete petition and IFP application no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the filing date of this order.

Failure to file a proper petition and complete IFP application in the time provided shall result in this action being dismissed without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner.

The Clerk shall enclose a copy of the first page of the letter and the envelope which opened this action under Docket No. 1, copies of the Clerk's notices filed under Docket Nos. 2 and 3, and a copy of this docket, with a copy of this order to Petitioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Hildebrand

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 11, 2023
23-cv-01303 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 11, 2023)
Case details for

In re Hildebrand

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MICHAEL HILDEBRAND, Petitioner.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 11, 2023

Citations

23-cv-01303 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 11, 2023)