From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hilbert Tunstall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 13, 2010
73 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 508294.

May 13, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Hilbert Tunstall, Wallkill, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur.


Petitioner brought the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been restored to petitioner's inmate account. In light of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Bornstorff v Fischer, 67 AD3d 1138; Matter of Anderson v Huntington, 63 AD3d 1390).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Hilbert Tunstall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 13, 2010
73 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Hilbert Tunstall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HILBERT TUNSTALL, Petitioner, v. JAMES J. WALSH, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 13, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4095
901 N.Y.S.2d 871