From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Heimlich

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Dec 8, 2006
No. 03-06-00743-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 8, 2006)

Opinion

No. 03-06-00743-CV.

Filed December 8, 2006.

Original Proceeding from Travis County.

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Edmund B. Heimlich filed a "Writ of Mandamus, Injunction, and Prohibition" on November 29, 2006. He thereafter informed this Court that "[t]he Writ is not a `petition' for action by the Court. It does not require any action by a Court Officer." He explained that the purpose of his November 29 filing was merely to submit his statements as part of the public record so that this Court and the Comptroller are on notice of the law. Because Heimlich does not request any actionable relief, we deny his writ of mandamus, injunction, and prohibition. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Heimlich

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Dec 8, 2006
No. 03-06-00743-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 8, 2006)
Case details for

In re Heimlich

Case Details

Full title:In RE EDMUND B. HEIMLICH

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Dec 8, 2006

Citations

No. 03-06-00743-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 8, 2006)