Opinion
No. 2024-CC-00249
03-06-2024
IN RE: SUCCESSION OF Betty Shadrick HEDIN
Weimer, C.J., additionally concurs for reasons assigned by Crichton, J. Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons. CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons:
Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Number(s) 2023-31127, Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2024 CW 0044.
PER CURIAM
1The writ is granted and made peremptory. Because the district court failed to conduct a contradictory hearing, order the taking of an inventory of the property of the succession, or require the posting of security as required by law, the judgment of the district court appointing a provisional administrator is vacated and set aside. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 3112, 3113. The case is remanded to the district court to make a determination, after a contradictory hearing, as to whether the appointment of a provisional administrator is warranted under La. Code Civ. P. art. 3111. See Succession of Smithy 22-565 (La. App. 5 Cir. 5/24/23), 367 So. 3d 800, 805 (the trial court has discretion in determining whether a provisional administrator is necessary to "preserve, safeguard, and operate the property of the succession."). If the court finds such an appointment is indeed warranted, it shall comply with all other requirements of law, including ordering the posting of security under La. Code Civ. P. art. 3112.
Weimer, C.J., additionally concurs for reasons assigned by Crichton, J.
Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons:
1I agree with the Court’s ruling vacating the district court’s ruling and remanding the matter for a contradictory hearing, pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 3111, regarding whether the appointment of a provisional administrator is warranted under the circumstances of this case. However, I write separately to highlight that the district court’s great discretion will allow it to examine all possible individuals who may serve as provisional administrator, whether it be Raymond E. Hedin (decedent’s husband), Mark A Storch (decedent’s son), or an independent third party. Given the contentious nature of the facts and circumstances as presently alleged, in my view, a contradictory hearing followed by a reasoned decision is paramount.